Talk:Lakas–CMD (1991)

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines High‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Merger

I think the Lakas-Kampi-CMD article should be merge with this article.. since this party is the surviving entity and no matter what.. people will still call the new party as Lakas anyway rather than Kampi.. peads (talk)

LAKAS Website

Does the party have an official website? And where is the address of their headquarters? John earlm 14:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2010 List

I added this since this is called the floaters, so that the surveys would include these: House Speaker Prospero Nograles, Lakas-CMD president released on June 2, 2008, its tentative 2010 senatorial elections line-up: • Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla, Jr. • Senator Manuel “Lito” Lapid • Agriculture Secretary Arthur Yap • Health Secretary Francisco Duque III • Metropolitan Manila Development Authority chairman Bayani Fernando • Quezon City Mayor Feliciano “Sonny” Belmonte • Representative Ed Zialcita, 1st District Parañaque • Representative Edcel Lagman, 1st District Albay • Representative Monico Puentevella, Bacolod City • Former senator Ralph Recto • Former representative Prospero Pichay • Representative Art Defensor, Iloilo • Former Ilocos Sur governor Luis “Chavit” Singson • Optical Media Board chairman Edu Manzano • Representative Abraham Baham Mitra, 2nd District Palawan • Former presidential chief of staff Michael DefensorInquirer.net, Lakas-CMD bares tentative senatorial line-up for 2010--Florentino floro (talk) 10:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eoomomic views

Whats this parties ecomimic postions?--J intela (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition for two weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lakas ng Tao – Christian Muslim Democrats → Lakas–CMD – It's quite easy to note that absolutely (almost) no one calls this party as "Lakas ng Tao – Christian Muslim Democrats". It's always "Lakas–CMD". If "CMD" is too ambiguous, it can be spelled out to "Christian Muslim Democrats."

(Note: As an erstwhile participant to the "Dash Wars", I'm not sure which dash/hyphen is appropriate.) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 04:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC) –H T D 06:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lakas–CMD (1991). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Democratic Socialist Movement to NUCD

Wikipedia apparently has no coverage of the history of the Christian Democratic Socialist Movement of Raul Manglapus from its 1968 founding to its renaming as the National Union of Christian Democrats prior to its merger with Lakas. This is a bit confusing. - Thundersub (talk) 04:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Election result tables

This has been a bone of contention for a while, and there has been no agreement on how this should be done. We have several models to choose from, and my preference is the French example, tailored to the Philippines. Socialist Party (France) is the model I personally want on, with some slight differences:

Vice presidential elections are a different table, as it is a different office. In the strictest sense of the world, there are no "running mates".
Senate and House elections are different tables due to the same reason as #1.
- Senate table has different "seats won" and "seats after" column due to it being a staggered election for most instances. House only has "Seats (won)" column.
House district and party-list elections may be in separate tables or not; these affect only a few parties (not Lakas) and we can figure this out as we move along.
Results column:
- President/vice presidential elections: No reference to who won, just won or lost.
- Legislative elections: Majority or split or minority (if won seats), lost if did not win seats
  - Party list can have optional results column.
  - For Senate elections, as these are a bit more complex:
    - In post-EDSA election, multi-party alliances are common; COMELEC only recognizes alliances if candidates actually run under its banner (example: Lakas ng Bayan, GAD, UPP-KBL, Koalisyon Pambansa, NPC (1995), Lakas (1992, 1998), LAMMP, KNP and UNA, but not Lakas-Laban, K4, TEAM Unity, GO, Team PNoy, UniTeam, TRoPa and MP3.
    - In determining results, this is determined on the party/alliance/coalition label recognised by COMELEC. Ergo, those not recognized are per party, so in 2022, NPC won several seats and is in the majority. UniTeam article can mention that they won plurality of seats contested.
This also keeps colors at a minimum, at the seats column/s, and at the results column.

For an example of the setup I prefer, see for Lakas-NUCD, Nacionalista (agnostic on "outcome" section), and Liberal Party (Philippines) (still not changed lol) Tagging YssaLang, who edited the current version on this article, Itsquietuptown, Katya2017, RandomCanadian, previously disccused this at Talk:Nacionalista Party#New electoral performance tables, and RioHondo, hueman1, TheNuggeteer, Borgenland, Ganmatthew, and Chipmunkdavis, members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Philippine politics. WP:PINOY will also been informed of this discussion.

Take note Katya2017's edit was reverted by RandomCanadian by violating MOS:COLOR. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Liberal Party (Philippines) apparently was already partially changed, with post-EDSA having both chambers under one table. See the original here. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]