Talk:Deoxys

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• List of generation III Pokémon
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:List of generation III Pokémon

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 July 2021. The result of the discussion was merge.

Pokémon

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon

Video games

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Form vs. Forme

I've noticed that quite a few player's guides (even Nintendo's), when referring to Deoxys' different forms, spell the word with an "e" at the end, (i.e.: "forme"). Should this be reflected in the article as well? The guides are printed in the U.S., so I'm unclear of the spelling differences. -SaturnYoshi ^{THE VOICES} 20:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should definitely be reflected in the article, because it is official Pokemon terminology. Not using the spelling would be disrespectful to all Pokemon fans, like myself. Plush toy 2000 00:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAC Nomination

As said on the FAC, this would be better suited for a GAC than an FAC at the moment; but it still would need a lot more inline references. --SidiLemine 12:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation

Hey, I've re-created the article from a merge. There is a cultural impact section, lots of references, and a lot of info, so I can't see this article being an AfD. Tezero (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, nevermind. Guess I have to develop it a bit more and find more sources that establish its notability. Tezero (talk) 01:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, nevermind again. Tezero (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ref dropping

IGN Rank 85 DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deoxys = No longer event-only

In Pokémon Omega Ruby/Alpha Sapphire, Deoxys can be obtained in the Delta Episode, thus making Deoxys no longer an event-only Pokémon. Just thought I should point this out. 68.119.28.72 (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doubting Deoxys' Designer

I have noticed that the designer is listed as being by Ken Sugimori in the main article, even though there is no source given. I have my doubts that Sugimori is the original creator and I have a feeling it could be Hironobu Yoshida. Similarly, I lack concrete evidence to prove this however I do believe the little evidence I do have is more plausible then anything we have linking towards the creator being by Sugimori (of which I can't seem to find any evidence of at all).

I wrote a comment about it on Bulbapedia a while ago, so I am just going to copy/paste that same comment here since it has my thought process going along with it:

"A source that predates this is a Spanish(?) Pokémon wiki that was initially added 2nd Nov 2013. The very earliest I can seem to find in English though is from summer 2013, and it's this forum stating the Pokémon he created are: Wobbufett, Deoxys, Celebi, Dunsparce and Magmortar. Though the sources are stated to be from Bulbapedia originally, a link is not given. To me, the most likely reason is that it originates from Hironobu illustrating the Deoxys cards for the TCG. I went to Wikipedia to look back at the Deoxys page history and the source given does not actually state Ken designed it - or anyone for that matter, though it quotes 'Deoxys was created by Ken Sugimori with the aid of a development team' in the 2010 Wikipedia article itself. Since then, a source for this claim is needed on Wikipedia.

I decided to look into some Japanese websites and this Yahoo answer from 2012 states similarly to the English forum. I found this twitter post which, while posted this year, seems to contain a screenshot of a strategy guide containing Hironobu's creator profile, where he is credited for creating Deoxys. I read more into this guide and apparently it is from an official strategy book - I still need to find a full visual source though. Then I found this site. The person on this site wanted to find out who designed Darkrai, and they found what seems to be a lot of evidence. This, along with many other Japanese sites also having this information, seems relatively convincing to me and, if right, would mean he would have designed Darkrai as well. Still, it would seem strange I haven't found a source from the developers mouths - though that doesn't seem to happen often anyway."

As I said, this is hardly a good enough set of sources to even suggest Yoshida is the designer, but if Ken was not the designer (which I'm not so certain he is) this is all I could find as a potential source. The reason to what made me question this fact in the first place was that the 2015 Guinness Book of World Records: Gamer's Edition stated that Deoxys was designed by Ken Sugimori, but had read on other internet sources that he was not the designer beforehand. I would have thought that Guinness Book of World Records would be a reliable source, but a lack of evidence online has had me question otherwise. Minccinda (talk) 00:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Deoxys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]